System goal first
Define what the organisation or value stream is trying to achieve and the measures that demonstrate progress.

Learn and apply the Theory of Constraints as a practical system for improving throughput, flow and delivery. Identify the system constraint, protect and exploit it, subordinate non-constraints, evaluate elevation options, design Drum-Buffer-Rope controls, record actions and evidence, assess organisational readiness, save or load projects as JSON, load a complete special-process example and create a professional PDF-ready report.
Define what the organisation or value stream is trying to achieve and the measures that demonstrate progress.
Work only creates throughput when the system delivers what the customer requires. Busy resources do not automatically create value.
The active constraint may be equipment, labour, policy, supplier capacity, information, approval, demand or management attention.
The constraint should not be starved, blocked, interrupted by avoidable work or used for tasks that can be performed elsewhere.
Work should enter the system in line with constraint capacity and customer need, limiting excess WIP and hidden queues.
After improvement, the former constraint may no longer be limiting. Controls and assumptions must be reviewed rather than preserved blindly.
The constraint sets the pace for the system. Its schedule should reflect customer priorities, realistic capacity, setups, maintenance and expected losses.
Time, material or capacity protection placed strategically so normal variation does not starve the constraint or jeopardise customer delivery.
The release signal that prevents work entering faster than the system can complete it. This limits WIP and exposes disruption earlier.
| Measure | Meaning | Management question |
|---|---|---|
| Throughput | Rate at which the system generates value through completed customer demand. | Did the change increase completed, accepted and deliverable output? |
| Inventory / investment | Money and resources tied up in items intended for sale or delivery, including WIP. | Did WIP rise without increasing throughput? |
| Operating expense | Money spent turning investment into throughput. | Did the change reduce expense without harming throughput, quality or resilience? |
| Constraint utilisation | Useful constraint time producing conforming output against planned available time. | How much time is lost to starvation, blockage, setup, defects, breakdown or non-constraint work? |
| Buffer status | Protection remaining before the constraint or delivery commitment is threatened. | Which causes repeatedly penetrate the buffer? |
| Flow time | Elapsed time from release to completion. | Can less work be released while maintaining or improving delivery? |
A qualified furnace may be the constraint. Improve loading readiness, schedule compatible cycles, protect maintenance windows and prevent avoidable rework without changing approved cycles.
The constraint may be tank capacity, rectifier capability, masking, laboratory release or final inspection. Control release and protect conforming first-pass yield.
Qualified personnel, equipment, technique approval or interpretation capacity may constrain flow. Remove non-value administration and prevent repeat examinations.
A qualified welder, fixture, inspection stage or engineering approval may be limiting. Keep constraint work ready and prevent defects consuming scarce qualified capacity.
The constraint can be disposition, concession approval, FAIR review or a scarce external provider. Prioritise decisions by throughput impact rather than age alone.
Batch rules, release approvals, performance targets or local utilisation measures can restrict flow even when physical capacity is available.